Article 7219 Cases
(1) In the interpretation of this Convention, regard is to be had to its international character and to the need to promote uniformity in its application and the observance of good faith in international trade.
(2) Questions concerning matters governed by this Convention which are not expressly settled in it are to be settled in conformity with the general principles on which it is based or, in the absence of such principles, in conformity with the law applicable by virtue of the rules of private international law.
Number |
Issue |
# Cases |
1 |
Interpretation of Convention |
3 |
1.1 |
Consideration of international character of Convention |
24 |
1.1.1 |
Recourse to Convention's legislative history |
6 |
1.2 |
Need for uniform application of Convention |
23 |
1.2.1 |
Recourse to foreign case law and scholarly writing |
57 |
2 |
Gaps in Convention |
1 |
2.1 |
Matters governed but not expressly settled by Convention |
51 |
Country |
Date |
Court |
Arbitral Award |
00-00-1993 |
ICC Court of Arbitration - Paris |
Arbitral Award |
15-06-1994 |
Internationales Schiedsgericht der Bundeskammer der gewerblichen Wirtschaft - Wien (Vienna), Austria |
Arbitral Award |
15-06-1994 |
Internationales Schiedsgericht der Bundeskammer der gewerblichen Wirtschaft - Wien (Vienna), Austria |
Arbitral Award |
23-08-1994 |
ICC Court of Arbitration - Paris |
Arbitral Award |
24-04-1996 |
Bulgarska turgosko-promishlena palata (Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry) |
Arbitral Award |
12-12-2007 |
American Arbitration Association |
Arbitral Award |
11-12-2020 |
American Arbitration Association – International Centre for Dispute Resolution |
Cases: 7 |
Argentina |
20-05-1991 |
Juzgado Nacional de Primera Instancia en lo Comercial No. 7 |
Argentina |
24-04-2000 |
Camara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires - Sala E |
Argentina |
21-07-2002 |
Camara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires |
Cases: 3 |
Austria |
29-06-1999 |
Oberster Gerichtshof |
Austria |
08-11-2005 |
Oberster Gerichtshof |
Cases: 2 |
Croatia |
04-03-2008 |
High Commercial Court |
Cases: 1 |
France |
13-09-1995 |
Cour d'Appel de Grenoble, Chambre Commerciale |
France |
14-01-1998 |
Cour d'Appel de Paris, 1ére chambre, section D |
France |
06-11-2001 |
Cour d'Appel de Paris |
France |
06-11-2013 |
Cour d'appel de Colmar |
Cases: 4 |
Germany |
12-03-1993 |
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf |
Germany |
02-07-1993 |
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf |
Germany |
05-04-1995 |
Landgericht Landshut |
Germany |
20-07-1995 |
Landgericht Aachen |
Germany |
25-05-1999 |
Landgericht Berlin |
Germany |
26-01-2000 |
Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg |
Germany |
13-04-2000 |
Amtsgericht Duisburg |
Germany |
09-01-2002 |
Bundesgerichtshof |
Germany |
30-06-2004 |
Bundesgerichtshof |
Cases: 9 |
Greece |
27-11-2007 |
Monomeles Protodikeio Thessalonikis |
Cases: 1 |
Italy |
11-12-1998 |
Corte di Appello di Milano |
Italy |
12-07-2000 |
Tribunale di Vigevano |
Italy |
26-11-2002 |
Tribunale di Rimini |
Italy |
24-11-2020 |
Corte Suprema di Cassazione |
Cases: 4 |
Japan |
06-12-2018 |
Tokyo Chiho Saibansho [District Court] |
Japan |
03-06-2019 |
Tokyo Chiho Saibansho [District Court] |
Cases: 2 |
Netherlands |
15-06-1994 |
Arrondissementsrechtbank Amsterdam |
Netherlands |
29-05-1997 |
Arrondissementsrechtbank Zutphen |
Netherlands |
16-10-2002 |
Hof 'S-Hertogenbosch |
Netherlands |
28-01-2005 |
Hoge Raad |
Netherlands |
02-01-2007 |
Gerechtshof's-Hertogenbosch |
Netherlands |
05-01-2022 |
Rechtbank Noord-Holland |
Cases: 6 |
Russian Federation |
27-10-2005 |
Tribunal of Int'l Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce |
Cases: 1 |
Switzerland |
09-09-1993 |
Handelsgericht Zürich |
Switzerland |
20-02-1997 |
Bezirksgericht der Saane |
Switzerland |
11-06-1999 |
Handelsgericht des Kantons Aargau |
Switzerland |
19-02-2004 |
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht |
Switzerland |
07-07-2004 |
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht |
Switzerland |
19-09-2005 |
Tribunal Cantonal Valais |
Switzerland |
28-01-2009 |
Tribunal cantonal du Valais |
Cases: 7 |
USA |
10-05-2002 |
U.S District Court, S.D., New York |
USA |
21-06-2002 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
USA |
28-04-2008 |
U.S. District Court, District of Kansas |
USA |
20-08-2008 |
U.S. District Court, New York (Southern District) |
Cases: 4 |
|
2.2 |
Matters excluded from scope of Convention (see art. 4) |
15 |
2.3 |
Methods for filling in gaps |
4 |
2.3.1 |
Application by analogy of other provisions of Convention |
9 |
2.3.2 |
Recourse to general principles of Convention |
25 |
2.3.2.1 |
Examples of general principles |
26 |
2.3.2.2 |
Recourse to UNIDROIT Principles |
27 |
2.3.3 |
Recourse to domestic law |
20 |
2.3.3.1 |
Applicable law determined by choice of law rules of forum |
22 |
2.3.3.2 |
Applicable choice of law rules in arbitration |
3 |
3 |
Concept of good faith in international trade |
1 |
3.1 |
Significance of good faith in international trade |
3 |
3.2 |
Good faith as aid in interpretation of Convention |
8 |
3.3 |
Good faith as a general principle of Convention |
18 |
3.3.1 |
Good faith during negotiations |
5 |
3.3.2 |
Good faith in interpretation of contract |
5 |
3.3.3 |
Good faith in performance of contract |
14 |