Selected Cases by Article & Issues
Article 3.2.82 Cases
(1) Where fraud, threat, gross disparity or a party"s mistake is imputable to, or is known or ought to be known by, a third person for whose acts the other party is responsible, the contract may be avoided under the same conditions as if the behaviour or knowledge had been that of the party itself.
(2) Where fraud, threat or gross disparity is imputable to a third person for whose acts the other party is not responsible, the contract may be avoided if that party knew or ought to have known of the fraud, threat or disparity, or has not at the time of avoidance reasonably acted in reliance on the contract.
(2) Where fraud, threat or gross disparity is imputable to a third person for whose acts the other party is not responsible, the contract may be avoided if that party knew or ought to have known of the fraud, threat or disparity, or has not at the time of avoidance reasonably acted in reliance on the contract.
| Number | Issue | # Cases | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ground of avoidance imputable to third person | 0 | |||||||||
| 1.1 | Third person for whom a party is responsible | 1 | |||||||||
| |||||||||||
| 1.1.1 | Third person's acts or knowledge imputed to party irrespective of that party's knowledge | 0 | |||||||||
| 1.2 | Third person for whom a party is not responsible | 1 | |||||||||
| 1.2.1 | Third person's acts or knowledge imputed to party only if that party knew or ought to have known of them | 0 | |||||||||
| 1.2.2 | Exceptions | 0 | |||||||||
Total Cases in the database 1528